The integrity and reputation of a brand and its presence in a digital landscape are significant concerns for all kinds of businesses, from large enterprises to small entrepreneurs. Not every company has strict brand safety guidelines upon record. However, any advertising activity involves understanding the desired as well as ultimately unwanted placements.
The biggest brand safety risks are usually associated with programmatic media buying and brand mentions – two types of digital advertising that are hard to take under 100% control. However, it does not mean you jeopardize brand safety with every ad network campaign or user review.
Today, we prepared the most actual recommendations on brand safety protection, suggested by AdTech Holding experts as the proven and widely adopted modern methods.
While brand safety has become a buzzword long ago, its fundamental importance is not always evident. What can be the consequences of the possible brand safety abuse? The traditional definitions sound like this:
One of the brightest examples of brand safety abuse is related to the scandal known as the ‘YouTube boycott’ that arose back in 2017, when Mars, McDonald’s, and a range of other corporations paused all their YouTube advertising campaigns. The reason for this boycott was the appearance of ad prerolls and midrolls in the video clip that contained extremist propaganda. Consequently, the situation led to financial losses for both sides: brands that wasted ad budgets and advertising effects, and YouTube, which risked its reputation and revenue from big customers.
In our example, brand safety was distorted by the wrong ad placement, which an advertiser could not control. However, there are more cases that might appear and require regular monitoring.
Another example is related to video hosting services again when brands stopped advertising efforts on the platform because of inappropriate comments on videos for children.
One such example was registered by AdEx, an anti-fraud advertising tool. While doing a standard check for one of its customers, an AdEx specialist discovered a suspicious link that led to a website with the official Barcelona FC domain. A thorough investigation showed that a fraudster got access to the domains and registered several pages that were misrepresented for Barcelona’s official projects. In reality, these pages suggested fake iGaming activities that stole user deposits. As a result, the official Barcelona FC domains became involved in the scam actions that could have affected brand safety if not for the prompt actions from the AdEx side.
Once the three biggest threats are revealed, brands can follow the guidelines to prevent possible issues and combat issues that arise. In this part, we collected the best practices from the security, compliance, and anti-ad fraud specialists from AdTech Holding.
As has already been mentioned, the biggest brand safety issue of programmatic media buying is the impossibility of checking every single traffic source. The solution here is evident: cooperation with the advertising networks can ensure clean ad environments.
How to understand that a network is capable of ensuring this? Here is a checklist of the features that give advertisers stronger confidence in their brand safety.
Most advertising networks come up with special separate rules for every ad format and common policies that prohibit any traffic sources that are not in line with them.
Modern networks make it possible for advertisers via several tools. These tools might include Blacklists for traffic zones that do not convert appropriately or do not bring the most relevant traffic; Whitelists for targeting the best traffic zones; specific targeting settings by GEO and age, which is essential when running campaigns with country and age restricted-products. In order to get enhanced control over traffic sources, advertisers must choose an ad network that thoroughly checks every source of traffic applying for network cooperation.
Brand mentions are harder but possible to control to some significant enough extent. The best practices suggested by compliance and PR specialists are the following:
As brand safety specialists claim, every negative or potentially negative mention must be handled. For example, if the brand gets a poor review, the responsible team needs to give a public reply, showing its interest in solving customers’ issues.
Unfortunately, ad fraud is becoming more and more sophisticated. This does not mean advertisers can not avoid serious encounters with fraudsters. The most logical, common, and reasonable guideline here is using modern anti-fraud tools, both in-house, provided by an ad platform, and external if an advertiser sees an additional value in extra protection.
In conclusion, maintaining brand safety is a combination of having strict guidelines on hand as well as partnering with reliable advertising providers. Such a complex approach safeguards companies’ reputations and minimizes ever-evolving risks or the consequences of brand safety abuse.